Fri Sep 5, 2008
Free Subscription

  
   
Search the Journal
 

 
Advanced Search

Journal Links
 

Return to Front Page
Table of Contents
About Us
Editorial Board
Call to Papers
Contact Us
Policies

 
My Account
 
Username:
Password:


Register - FREE
Account Help
 

Defining Evil
A Depravity Scale for Today’s Courts
Volume 5, Issue 5 -- Published: Thursday, May 10, 2001 -- Last Updated: Monday, Mar 11, 2002

Email to a colleague Comment on article Bookmark article Copyright & reprint info

 


Issues: Insanity Defense, Daubert

Featuring Expert Commentary by:

Michael Welner, M.D.
The Forensic Panel

Jump to expert commentary below.

Michael Welner, M.D.
Chairman
The Forensic Panel
Welner: Forensic Psychiatrists hike along pitch black and winding roads of the mind as a matter of course. Encountered, in all the darkness, are people with stories to tell of mistakes and misdeeds, of criminal acts and often, criminal minds. We share these tales of sociopaths, the ill, and those in whom we see ourselves, insulated by our defenses. Even amidst this, evil appears only occasionally, undetected and unexpected, but most unforgettable. For years, the behavioral sciences have maintained distance from explaining evil acts and evil minds. The result? A lingering gap between criminal responsibility and morality for which no explanation is offered. A lack of direction continues to force courts to employ arbitrary standards for wickedness.
What is "depraved," as in depraved indifference? In New York, where depraved indifference means circumstances which create a grave risk to human life, depravity aggravates an assault charge (NYS CPL § 120.10). Or, even if no physical injury occurs, depravity warrants a charge of reckless endangerment (NYS CPL § 120.25). Defense attorneys bemoan how some prosecutors charge depraved indifference, talking advantage of the vagueness of its definition to aggravate the charges against defendants alleged to have committed a variety of crimes.
Nowhere is the standardless standard more fraught with consequences than in capital offenses. All across America, death penalty statutes include various aggravating and mitigating circumstances. See Table 1. A closer look reveals a thesaurus of behaviors and actions listed as aggravating factors. Such terms as "especially heinous;" "outrageously vile;" "wanton;" "cruel;" "atrocious;" "horrible;" and others are used time and again in today’s courts. What is the difference between horrible and vile? If you know, skip to the next section of this magazine. If, like the most triers of fact, you do not, you are not the first to run scrambling for the dictionary.
To read the rest of this story go to:
http://www.forensicpanel.com/depravity/phase_b/
Take the Depravity Scale Project Exam here!
Read the complete article that started this research here!

Feedback: What do you have to say?  |  Help: Get expert assistance for your own case

Return to the front page of The Forensic Echo now!

Terms of Use   |   Privacy Statement
All Rights Reserved. Copyright © 1996-2003 The Forensic Panel